What concrete detail in Onchain Micropayments Digest helps explain citation rewards weighted by source contribution?

Archived dispatch

Moderateconfidence— 1 evidence-verified source cover every sub-claim, but corroboration or support strength is limited

9/30/2026, 2:43:18 PM · llm:deepseek:deepseek-v4-flash + heuristic (fallback from llm:mimo:mimo-v2.5) on 1 step

§ IIThe reading1 cited

Moderateconfidence— 1 evidence-verified source cover every sub-claim, but corroboration or support strength is limiteddeep researchpreview plan 1/1 claimsportfolio 1/1 · evidence 100%

The Onchain Micropayments Digest states that a fair model pays each cited source in proportion to its contribution to the final answer, with heavily-relied-upon sources earning more and lightly-used ones earning less . It further notes that weighted nanopayments make this granular settlement practical, and that multi-author works can split a single reward across contributors automatically .

Evidence ledger — quotes verified before rewards

What concrete detail in the Onchain Micropayments Digest helps explain citation rewards weighted by source contribution?
90%
“A fair model pays each cited source in proportion to its contribution to the final answer.” [S1] Per-citation payments weighted by contribution
“Heavily-relied-upon sources earn more; lightly-used ones earn less.” [S1] Per-citation payments weighted by contribution

Cited sources and planned rewards

1Per-citation payments weighted by contributionOnchain Micropayments Digest100%$0.015 planned

Helpful?

Spent$0.015

To creators100%

Decisions0 bought · 1 cached · 20 skipped

llm:deepseek:deepseek-v4-flash + heuristic (fallback from llm:mimo:mimo-v2.5) on 1 steplive on Arc testnet

Decision log · 45 steps

§ IThe decision$0.015 settled / $0.03

50%$0.015 under cap

Decompose

Breaking down: "What concrete detail in Onchain Micropayments Digest helps explain citation rewards weighted by source contribution?"

Decompose

Identified 1 research target(s) to investigate; these are not established facts

Decompose

Deep mode: up to 4 paid/cached reads plus one bounded gap-expansion pass when needed.

Discover

Discovered 21 verified source(s)

Discover

Recalled 60 past runs on this subject — how these sources performed when they were available.

Discover

ERC-8004 reputation loaded — composite scores on this subject.

Pre-check

Claim-aware portfolio selected 1/1 positive proposal(s): 1 cached + 0 fresh, predicting 1/1 claim(s) above the evidence floor with $0.000000/$0.015000 fetch USDC reserved.

Pre-check

Free-preview pre-check maps an actionable source to every sub-claim (1/1); paid reading may proceed within the budget.

DecideCACHE

Onchain Micropayments Digest — Per-citation payments weighted by contribution$0.005 · EV 50%

Already cached and still relevant (matches onchain, micropayments, digest, citation, weighted); reuse for free instead of paying again. — selected for the claim-aware evidence portfolio (targets claim 1; 0 fetch USDC, 1 attention slot).

DecideSKIP

Stablecoin Ledger — Why USDC settles instantly onchain$0.003 · EV 8%

Already cached and still relevant (matches onchain); reuse for free instead of paying again. — the free-preview coverage check could not connect this source to any sub-claim, so no toll is authorized.

DecideSKIP

Agent Economy Weekly — x402 turns HTTP 402 into an agent payment rail$0.004 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.004 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Distributed Systems Notes — Idempotency keys prevent double-spends$0.003 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.003 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Garden & Soil Monthly — Building a no-dig raised bed$0.002 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.002 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Retro Game Hardware — Recapping a 1990s console$0.002 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.002 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Stripe Blog — Analyzing the evidence that helps businesses win “product not received” disputes$0.002 · EV 8%

Already cached and still relevant (matches helps); reuse for free instead of paying again. — the free-preview coverage check could not connect this source to any sub-claim, so no toll is authorized.

DecideSKIP

Ethereum Foundation Blog — The triage is the product: running AI agents against Ethereum's protocol code$0.002 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.002 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Cointelegraph.com News — Onchain, in court: What happened in crypto legal news this week$0.002 · EV 8%

DecideSKIP

Latent.Space — PRs NOT Welcome: How Top AI Open Source Projects Are Managing Thousands of Contributors$0.004 · EV 8%

Already cached and still relevant (matches source); reuse for free instead of paying again. — the free-preview coverage check could not connect this source to any sub-claim, so no toll is authorized.

DecideSKIP

Simon Willison's Weblog — Anthropic’s best AI model struggles to attract users as cheaper tools thrive$0.003 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.003 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Hugging Face - Blog — How to Use NVIDIA Warp and MjWarp to Accelerate Robotics Simulation and Learning Workflows$0.003 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.003 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Vitalik Buterin's website — Low-risk defi can be for Ethereum what search was for Google$0.004 · EV 8%

Weak match (only onchain); not worth 0.004 USDC.

DecideSKIP

The Coinbase Blog - Medium — In response to the Wall Street Journal$0.003 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.003 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Decrypt — Putin Signs Russia's First Crypto Law: Trading Is Legal, Payments Stay Banned$0.002 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.002 USDC.

DecideSKIP

CoinDesk: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Crypto News and Price Data — Crypto Long & Short: Inside the 300-to-1 onchain gap between the dollar and euro$0.002 · EV 8%

DecideSKIP

Inner Axiom — The Codex — ISIS: The Godess, From An Esoteric Perspective$0.002 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.002 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Conzit Labs — The Evolution of AI: Open-Source vs. Closed Models$0.002 · EV 8%

DecideSKIP

Arc Settlement Benchmarks — Measuring x402 settlement latency on Arc$0.003 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.003 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Web Payments Review — How long do x402 payments take to finalize?$0.002 · EV 0%

Weak match (no key terms); not worth 0.002 USDC.

DecideSKIP

Keryx Engineering (first-party) — How Keryx pays cited creators$0.002 · EV 25%

Already cached and still relevant (matches citation, rewards, contribution); reuse for free instead of paying again. — cached bytes are free, but this read does not clear the attention gate (EV 0.25, minimum 0.45, with a required claim target).

Fetch

Agent spend wallet ready: 0x29028Fe1122E17Fe7863A22701e863FE4DaE1aFB (balance sufficient)

Fetch

Reused cached Onchain Micropayments Digest — Per-citation payments weighted by contribution (free) — S1

Re-evaluate

Sub-claim "What concrete detail in the Onchain Micropayments Digest hel…": 90% covered by S1 — S1 directly answers the question: it states a fair model pays each cited source in proportion to its contribution, with heavily-relied-upon sources earning more and lightly-used ones less, and notes weighted nanopayments make granular settlement practical and multi-author works can split a single reward automatically. This is a concrete mechanism for weighting citation rewards by source contribution. Minor gap: the abstract does not specify the exact weighting formula or how contribution is measured, but the question asks for a concrete detail that helps explain the weighting, which is provided.

Re-evaluate

Coverage is already adequate (0.9) from S1, which explicitly describes proportional, contribution-weighted citation payments. No skipped source is needed to fill a sub-0.5 gap, and remaining budget should be preserved.

Sufficiency

Final check — "What concrete detail in the Onchain Micropayments Digest hel…": 100% assessed by S1

Sufficiency

Final coverage assessment — The supplied abstract from the Onchain Micropayments Digest directly states the concrete mechanism: a fair model pays each cited source in proportion to its contribution, with heavily-relied-upon sources earning more and lightly-used ones earning less, and weighted nanopayments making granular settlement practical. This explicitly answers how citation rewards are weighted by source contribution. No requested part remains missing.

Synthesize

Synthesizing a grounded answer from 1 source(s)…

Evidence

Relevance review returned; only checked excerpts can retain support, and review cannot raise it.

Evidence

Verified — S1 supports claim 1 at 90%: “A fair model pays each cited source in proportion to its contribution to the final answer.”

Evidence

Verified — S1 supports claim 1 at 90%: “Heavily-relied-upon sources earn more; lightly-used ones earn less.”

Synthesize

Drafted answer citing 1 source(s)

Verdict

Confidence: Moderate — 1 evidence-verified source cover every sub-claim, but corroboration or support strength is limited.

Attribute

Onchain Micropayments Digest contributed 100% → reward $0.015

Settle

Settled $0.009 citation reward → Mara Okoye (173dd04c-b…)

Settle

Settled $0.006 citation reward → Devin Park (8c5d3687-1…)

Done

Done. Spent $0.015 across 2 confirmed/simulated payment(s) to creators.

Portable research receipt

Take the evidence trail with you

One deterministic JSON bundle binds the answer, visible decisions, exact article versions, claim evidence and a Circle-settlement snapshot under SHA-256. Retain the digest to detect later changes; the self-check is not a publisher or Keryx signature.

View JSON ↗Download

Exact receipt still current

1 exact cited article version still match Keryx's current index.

Inspect machine-readable audit

Ask a follow-upNew dispatch · creators paid again

Carries this dispatch’s question as context — never its answer. The next dispatch is read from sources bought for it.

From the archive

Related dispatches

DispatchSep 30, 2026

What concrete detail in Onchain Micropayments Digest helps explain sub-cent payments per cited source?

1 source cited$0.0150 to creators

DispatchSep 30, 2026

What concrete detail in Keryx Engineering (first-party) helps explain Keryx evidence checks before citation rewards?

1 source cited$0.0150 to creators

DispatchSep 30, 2026

What does Onchain Micropayments Digest establish about transaction gas as a barrier to tiny creator rewards, and what remains uncertain?

1 source cited$0.0150 to creators

DispatchSep 30, 2026

What does Onchain Micropayments Digest establish about the claimed $0.000001 nanopayment floor, and what remains uncertain?

1 source cited$0.0150 to creators

Browse the full archive ▸