Breaking down: "What concrete detail in Onchain Micropayments Digest helps explain sub-cent payments per cited source?"

Identified 1 research target(s) to investigate; these are not established facts

Deep mode: up to 4 paid/cached reads plus one bounded gap-expansion pass when needed.

Discovered 21 verified source(s)

Recalled 60 past runs on this subject — how these sources performed when they were available.

ERC-8004 reputation loaded — composite scores on this subject.

Claim-aware portfolio selected 1/1 positive proposal(s): 1 cached + 0 fresh, predicting 1/1 claim(s) above the evidence floor with $0.000000/$0.015000 fetch USDC reserved.

Free-preview pre-check maps an actionable source to every sub-claim (1/1); paid reading may proceed within the budget.

Agent spend wallet ready: 0x29028Fe1122E17Fe7863A22701e863FE4DaE1aFB (balance sufficient)

Reused cached Onchain Micropayments Digest — Per-citation payments weighted by contribution (free) — S1

Sub-claim "What concrete detail in Onchain Micropayments Digest helps e…": 50% covered by S1 — S1 provides a concrete mechanism: per-citation payments weighted by contribution, where heavily-relied-upon sources earn more and lightly-used ones earn less, and weighted nanopayments make granular settlement practical, with multi-author works splitting a single reward automatically. This directly explains how sub-cent per-source payments could be computed and settled. However, it does not explicitly state a sub-cent amount, a per-citation price, or a concrete numeric example, so the 'sub-cent' aspect is only partially addressed.

Coverage is partial but adequate for the narrow question; S1 supplies the concrete weighting/nanopayment mechanism. No skipped source specifically addresses sub-cent per-citation micropayment mechanics, so buying more is not justified.

Final check — "What concrete detail in Onchain Micropayments Digest helps e…": 40% assessed by S1

Final coverage assessment — The only gathered source (S1) is an abstract of the Onchain Micropayments Digest. It states that 'weighted nanopayments make this granular settlement practical' and that payments are proportional to contribution, which is a concrete detail relevant to sub-cent payments. However, the question asks for a concrete detail that helps explain sub-cent payments per cited source, and the abstract does not provide specific numeric or mechanistic details (e.g., how sub-cent amounts are achieved, per-citation cost figures, or technical implementation). The passage only gives a high-level statement about weighted nanopayments enabling granular settlement. Thus, it provides topical context and a partial answer but lacks the concrete detail requested. The assessment does not establish a complete supported answer for every requested part.

Synthesizing a grounded answer from 1 source(s)…

Relevance review returned; only checked excerpts can retain support, and review cannot raise it.

Below reward gate — S1 supports claim 1 at 20%: “Heavily-relied-upon sources earn more; lightly-used ones earn less.”

Verified — S1 supports claim 1 at 50%: “Weighted nanopayments make this granular settlement practical, and multi-author works can split a single reward across contributors automati…”

Drafted answer citing 1 source(s)

Confidence: Low — the final assessment does not establish a complete supported answer for every requested part.

Onchain Micropayments Digest contributed 100% → reward $0.015

Settled $0.009 citation reward → Mara Okoye (17bf5820-1…)

Settled $0.006 citation reward → Devin Park (222969de-3…)

Done. Spent $0.015 across 2 confirmed/simulated payment(s) to creators.