Archived dispatch

Can you give a concrete example of blockchains for tiny automated payments using published source material?

Moderateconfidence— source preferences are explained, but conflicting evidence limits confidence

9/30/2026, 12:03:02 PM · llm:deepseek:deepseek-v4-flash

§ IIThe reading2 cited
Moderateconfidence— source preferences are explained, but conflicting evidence limits confidencedeep researchpreview plan 2/2 claimsportfolio 3/6 · evidence 67%

For tiny automated payments, the published sources point to Arc as the blockchain used, with x402 as the payment rail. Arc testnet measurements show x402 batched settlements finalizing in roughly 180 milliseconds, and Arc's BFT consensus delivers sub-second finality so a Gateway-batched payment confirms in well under a quarter second, unlike an Ethereum L1 transaction . The concrete documented example is x402 batched settlements on Arc testnet, where thousands of submitBatch calls were measured . Separately, x402 is described as reviving the HTTP 402 status as a real payment rail, allowing agents to pay per request without accounts or API keys. However, the sources disagree on settlement timing: one source states x402 payments take about 15 seconds to settle, similar to an Ethereum L1 block time, because each payment is its own transaction waiting to be mined . The Arc-specific measurement is more specific and internally consistent with its described BFT consensus, so it is treated as the trusted account for Arc-based x402 settlement.

Evidence ledger — quotes verified before rewards

  1. Which blockchains are used for tiny automated payments?

    70%
    “Arc's BFT consensus delivers sub-second finality, so a Gateway-batched payment confirms in well under a quarter second — it is not block-time-bound the way an Ethereum L1 transaction is.” [S1] Measuring x402 settlement latency on Arc
  2. What concrete example of a blockchain for tiny automated payments is documented in published sources?

    80%
    “Across thousands of submitBatch calls on Arc testnet, x402 batched settlements finalize in roughly 180 milliseconds (measured median 178ms, p95 240ms).” [S1] Measuring x402 settlement latency on Arc
    “In our reading, an x402 payment takes about 15 seconds to settle, similar to an Ethereum L1 block time, because each payment is its own transaction waiting to be mined into a block.” [S3] How long do x402 payments take to finalize?

Cited sources and planned rewards

Helpful?
Spent$0.015
To creators100%
Decisions0 bought · 3 cached · 18 skipped
llm:deepseek:deepseek-v4-flashlive on Arc testnet
Decision log · 54 steps
§ IThe decision$0.015 settled / $0.03
50%$0.015 under cap
Decompose

Breaking down: "Can you give a concrete example of blockchains for tiny automated payments using published source material?"

Decompose

Identified 2 research target(s) to investigate; these are not established facts

Decompose

Deep mode: up to 4 paid/cached reads plus one bounded gap-expansion pass when needed.

Discover

Discovered 21 verified source(s)

Discover

Recalled 60 past runs on this subject — how these sources performed when they were available.

Discover

ERC-8004 reputation loaded — composite scores on this subject.

Pre-check

Claim-aware portfolio selected 3/6 positive proposal(s): 3 cached + 0 fresh, predicting 2/2 claim(s) above the evidence floor with $0.000000/$0.015000 fetch USDC reserved.

Pre-check

Free-preview pre-check maps an actionable source to every sub-claim (2/2); paid reading may proceed within the budget.

DecideCACHE
Arc Settlement Benchmarks — Measuring x402 settlement latency on Arc$0.003 · EV 60%

Cached abstract benchmarking x402 batched settlement on Arc testnet — a concrete blockchain rail for tiny automated payments. Reputation 24/100, cited 39% of reads. Supports claims 0 and 1. — selected for the claim-aware evidence portfolio (targets claims 1, 2; 0 fetch USDC, 1 attention slot).

DecideCACHE
Agent Economy Weekly — x402 turns HTTP 402 into an agent payment rail$0.004 · EV 60%

Cached abstract on x402 as an agent payment rail — directly relevant to concrete blockchain rails for tiny automated payments. Reputation 20/100, cited 30% of reads. Supports claims 0 and 1. — selected for the claim-aware evidence portfolio (targets claims 1, 2; 0 fetch USDC, 1 attention slot).

DecideCACHE
Web Payments Review — How long do x402 payments take to finalize?$0.002 · EV 55%

Cached abstract on x402 payment finalization timing — relevant to concrete blockchain rails for tiny automated payments. Reputation 25/100, cited 44% of reads. Supports claims 0 and 1. — selected for the claim-aware evidence portfolio (targets claims 1, 2; 0 fetch USDC, 1 attention slot).

DecideSKIP
Stablecoin Ledger — Stablecoins as the unit of account for agents$0.003 · EV 50%

Cached abstract on stablecoins as agent unit of account — relevant to which blockchains/rails support tiny automated payments (USDC/EURC onchain settlement), but only an abstract, so modest value. Supports claim 0. — the claim-aware portfolio chose a stronger, less redundant set inside the 4-source attention and $0.015000 fetch-budget caps, so this proposal stays unspent.

DecideSKIP
Onchain Micropayments Digest — Per-citation payments weighted by contribution$0.005 · EV 45%

Cached abstract on sub-cent/nanopayments and gas-efficient settlement primitives — topical for tiny automated payments, though preview is about citation weighting. Supports claim 0. — the claim-aware portfolio chose a stronger, less redundant set inside the 4-source attention and $0.015000 fetch-budget caps, so this proposal stays unspent.

DecideSKIP
Distributed Systems Notes — Idempotency keys prevent double-spends$0.003 · EV 15%

Idempotency keys for retries is generic distributed-systems material, not a concrete blockchain example for tiny payments. Low relevance.

DecideSKIP
Garden & Soil Monthly — Building a no-dig raised bed$0.002 · EV 2%

Gardening content, entirely off-topic.

DecideSKIP
Retro Game Hardware — Recapping a 1990s console$0.002 · EV 2%

Retro console repair, entirely off-topic.

DecideSKIP
Stripe Blog — Analyzing the evidence that helps businesses win “product not received” disputes$0.002 · EV 10%

Stripe dispute-evidence analysis is about chargebacks, not blockchains for tiny automated payments. Off-topic.

DecideSKIP
Ethereum Foundation Blog — The triage is the product: running AI agents against Ethereum's protocol code$0.002 · EV 15%

Ethereum Foundation post on AI agents triaging protocol code — Ethereum is a blockchain but the preview is about security triage, not tiny automated payments. Weak fit.

DecideSKIP
Cointelegraph.com News — SoFi tie-up shows stablecoins can provide alternative blockchain settlement rail$0.002 · EV 40%

Cached abstract on SoFi moving card settlement to a stablecoin blockchain rail — a concrete blockchain settlement example, though at $25B volume rather than tiny payments. Supports claim 1. — cached bytes are free, but this read does not clear the attention gate (EV 0.40, minimum 0.45, with a required claim target).

DecideSKIP
Latent.Space — GPT-6 Astra: an automated AI Engineer you can hire for <$6 an hour$0.004 · EV 15%

Full-text but about hiring an AI engineer for <$6/hr; no blockchain micropayment example. Latent.Space has 0 citations on this subject.

DecideSKIP
Simon Willison's Weblog — Using Blender with coding agents on macOS$0.003 · EV 5%

Metadata-only, no preview content, and Blender/coding agents is off-topic.

DecideSKIP
Hugging Face - Blog — Give Your Coding Agents a Memory You Own$0.003 · EV 5%

Metadata-only title about agent memory; no blockchain micropayment content.

DecideSKIP
Vitalik Buterin's website — Low-risk defi can be for Ethereum what search was for Google$0.004 · EV 20%

Metadata-only preview; low-risk DeFi on Ethereum is tangentially about onchain settlement but no concrete tiny-payment example and no readable content.

DecideSKIP
The Coinbase Blog - Medium — Coinbase Cloud launches platform for web3 developers$0.003 · EV 15%

2022 Coinbase Cloud developer-platform launch; not about blockchains for tiny automated payments.

DecideSKIP
Decrypt — Sony Says You Don't Own the Games You Bought. Crypto Says It Can Fix That$0.002 · EV 10%

Sony game ownership/NFTs — not about tiny automated payments.

DecideSKIP
CoinDesk: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Crypto News and Price Data — Hana Bank issues South Korea’s first digital bond using Euroclear’s blockchain$0.002 · EV 20%

Digital bond issuance on Euroclear's blockchain is a settlement example but institutional/large-value, not tiny automated payments.

DecideSKIP
Inner Axiom — The Codex — ISIS: The Godess, From An Esoteric Perspective$0.002 · EV 2%

Esoteric mythology content, entirely off-topic.

DecideSKIP
Conzit Labs — Revolutionizing Fan Loyalty: A Blockchain Approach$0.002 · EV 10%

Fan-loyalty blockchain article; not about tiny automated payments.

DecideSKIP
Keryx Engineering (first-party) — Recovering a Keryx paid research job$0.002 · EV 50%

First-party Keryx full-text on paid research job recovery; highest reputation (40/100) and full text, but preview concerns buyer recovery rather than a concrete blockchain for tiny payments. Supports claim 0 loosely. — the claim-aware portfolio chose a stronger, less redundant set inside the 4-source attention and $0.015000 fetch-budget caps, so this proposal stays unspent.

Fetch

Agent spend wallet ready: 0x29028Fe1122E17Fe7863A22701e863FE4DaE1aFB (balance sufficient)

Fetch

Reused cached Arc Settlement Benchmarks — Measuring x402 settlement latency on Arc (free) — S1

Fetch

Reused cached Agent Economy Weekly — x402 turns HTTP 402 into an agent payment rail (free) — S2

Fetch

Reused cached Web Payments Review — How long do x402 payments take to finalize? (free) — S3

Re-evaluate

Sub-claim "Which blockchains are used for tiny automated payments?": 70% covered by S1, S2 — S1 names Arc (Arc testnet) as a blockchain where x402 batched settlements finalize in ~180ms, and S2 documents x402 as a per-request agent payment rail. Together they identify Arc as a blockchain used for tiny automated payments. The answer is direct but limited to one named chain; no broader survey of chains is provided.

Re-evaluate

Sub-claim "What concrete example of a blockchain for tiny automated pay…": 80% covered by S1, S2 — S1 gives a concrete documented example: thousands of submitBatch calls on Arc testnet, x402 batched settlements finalizing in roughly 180ms median (178ms, p95 240ms), with Arc's BFT consensus delivering sub-second finality. S2 supplies the x402 per-request payment mechanism. This is a direct concrete example, though S3 offers a conflicting 15-second Ethereum L1-style settlement view that is not reconciled.

Re-evaluate

Coverage is adequate for both sub-claims: Arc is explicitly named as the blockchain, and a concrete documented example (x402 batched settlement on Arc testnet with ~180ms finality) is provided. No affordable skipped source clearly fills a remaining gap; the skipped items concern stablecoins, idempotency, disputes, or unrelated topics, not additional concrete blockchain examples for tiny automated payments. Remaining budget is small and buying more is not warranted.

Sufficiency

Final check — "Which blockchains are used for tiny automated payments?": 80% assessed by S1

Sufficiency

Final check — "What concrete example of a blockchain for tiny automated pay…": 80% assessed by S1

Sufficiency

Final coverage assessment — S1 documents a concrete blockchain (Arc) used for tiny automated payments via x402 batched settlements, with measured finality (~180ms median). S2 provides topical context on x402 as an agent payment rail but does not name a specific blockchain. S3 discusses x402 settlement timing but names no blockchain and is a general timing view, not a concrete blockchain example. The requested concrete example is directly supported by S1; no requested part remains missing.

Synthesize

Synthesizing a grounded answer from 3 source(s)…

Evidence

Relevance review returned; only checked excerpts can retain support, and review cannot raise it.

Adjudicate

⚖️ Sources disagreed on x402 settlement timing — S1 x402 batched settlements on Arc testnet finalize in roughly 180 milliseconds, with sub-second finality and not block-time-bound like Ethereum L1. vs S3 x402 payments take about 15 seconds to settle, similar to Ethereum L1 block time, because each payment is its own transaction waiting to be mined. → reported preference: S1 (S1 provides a specific measured benchmark on Arc testnet and is internally consistent with its described BFT consensus, whereas S3 is a general reading without Arc-specific measurement.)

Evidence

Verified — S1 supports claim 1 at 70%: “Arc's BFT consensus delivers sub-second finality, so a Gateway-batched payment confirms in well under a quarter second — it is not block-tim…”

Evidence

Verified — S1 supports claim 2 at 90%: “Across thousands of submitBatch calls on Arc testnet, x402 batched settlements finalize in roughly 180 milliseconds (measured median 178ms, …”

Evidence

Below reward gate — S2 supports claim 2 at 20%: “Agents can therefore pay per request with no accounts or API keys, discovering and purchasing data autonomously at runtime.”

Evidence

Verified — S3 supports claim 2 at 60%: “In our reading, an x402 payment takes about 15 seconds to settle, similar to an Ethereum L1 block time, because each payment is its own tran…”

Evidence

Rejected 0 invalid evidence span(s) and 1 unsupported citation marker(s); rejected markers cannot receive citation rewards.

Synthesize

Drafted answer citing 2 source(s)

Verdict

Confidence: Moderate — source preferences are explained, but conflicting evidence limits confidence.

Attribute

Arc Settlement Benchmarks contributed 70% → reward $0.0105

Attribute

Web Payments Review contributed 30% → reward $0.0045

Settle

Settled $0.0105 citation reward → Arc Settlement Benchmarks (0234857e-c…)

Settle

Settled $0.0045 citation reward → Web Payments Review (04389f5c-7…)

Done

Done. Spent $0.015 across 2 confirmed/simulated payment(s) to creators.

Portable research receipt

Take the evidence trail with you

One deterministic JSON bundle binds the answer, visible decisions, exact article versions, claim evidence and a Circle-settlement snapshot under SHA-256. Retain the digest to detect later changes; the self-check is not a publisher or Keryx signature.

Exact receipt still current

2 exact cited article versions still match Keryx's current index.

Inspect machine-readable audit

Ask a follow-upNew dispatch · creators paid again

Carries this dispatch’s question as context — never its answer. The next dispatch is read from sources bought for it.

From the archive

Related dispatches