I am a technical analyst at a small startup evaluating Keryx's creator-payment receipts. Read the registered, verified Keryx Engineering (first-party) source, specifically the full article 'How Keryx pays cited creators' at https://github.com/tang-vu/keryx/blob/main/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md (feed: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tang-vu/keryx/main/docs/engineering/feed.xml). In a short English note, explain the difference between an access toll and a citation reward, whether a paid read guarantees a reward, and what happens to the citation pool when no citation qualifies. Give an inspectable citation to that article and one limitation of what a citation reward proves. Label the article as first-party documentation at its stated revision, rather than evidence of current independent customer adoption. Use the eligible registered creator route within the 0.02 USDC source/reward budget; disclose actual access and citation payments separately.
10/7/2026, 11:45:06 PM · llm:deepseek:deepseek-v4-flash
> ⚠ Low confidence — Each summary sentence is tied to a verbatim excerpt and model-checked; completeness and independent factual correctness remain unverified. Evidence assessment: 2 evidence-verified sources cover every sub-claim, but corroboration or support strength is limited. Treat this as provisional.
Model-written summary with sentence-level citations. Each sentence is followed by the verbatim source text it was checked against; sentences without a qualifying excerpt were removed.
Research target 1
Requested topic (unverified): “According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what is the difference between an access toll and a citation reward?”
Keryx separates the cost of opening source content from the reward for citing it. Source text: “Keryx separates the cost of opening source content from the reward for citing it.”
A citation reward is a separate payment considered after the answer is written and its evidence checked. Source text: “A citation reward is a separate payment considered after the answer is written and its evidence checked.”
Research target 2
Requested topic (unverified): “According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, does a paid read guarantee a citation reward?”
A paid read does not guarantee a citation reward. Source text: “A paid read does not guarantee a citation reward.”
Research target 3
Requested topic (unverified): “According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what happens to the citation pool when no citation qualifies?”
When no citation qualifies, the citation pool stays unspent while access tolls already settled remain paid. Source text: “When no citation qualifies, the citation pool stays unspent, while access tolls already settled remain paid.”
Research target 4
Requested topic (unverified): “What limitation does the specified Keryx Engineering article indicate about what a citation reward proves?”
The article is first-party engineering documentation based on repository commit 9ea84fa, not independent reporting or customer evidence. Source text: “This is first-party engineering documentation based on repository commit 9ea84fa, not independent reporting or customer evidence.”
Summary sentences are model-written and model-checked, not independently verified; they claim no more than their excerpts and are not a complete synthesis. Excerpts establish source grounding, not that a source is correct. Source statements may be wrong or conflicting. Payment states remain in the separate receipt.
Supplied original source status
- https://github.com/tang-vu/keryx/blob/main/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md: Bounded text extracted from https://github.com/tang-vu/keryx/blob/main/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md; qualifying excerpts retained.
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tang-vu/keryx/main/docs/engineering/feed.xml: SKIP: Caller-supplied Keryx Engineering feed.xml; free read may confirm the article's stated revision/date and first-party provenance, supporting targets 0-3 indirect
Evidence ledger — recorded source excerpts
Research targets are unverified topics. Coverage is an estimate of excerpt support, not proof of entailment, factual truth or a complete answer.
Requested topic (unverified): “According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what is the difference between an access toll and a citation reward?”
90% estimated“Keryx separates the cost of opening source content from the reward for citing it.” [S1] keryx/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md at main · tang-vu/keryx · GitHub
“A citation reward is a separate payment considered after the answer is written and its evidence checked.” [S1] keryx/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md at main · tang-vu/keryx · GitHub
Requested topic (unverified): “According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, does a paid read guarantee a citation reward?”
95% estimated“A paid read does not guarantee a citation reward.” [S1] keryx/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md at main · tang-vu/keryx · GitHub
Requested topic (unverified): “According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what happens to the citation pool when no citation qualifies?”
95% estimated“When no citation qualifies, the citation pool stays unspent, while access tolls already settled remain paid.” [S2] How Keryx pays cited creators
Requested topic (unverified): “What limitation does the specified Keryx Engineering article indicate about what a citation reward proves?”
70% estimated“This is first-party engineering documentation based on repository commit 9ea84fa, not independent reporting or customer evidence.” [S2] How Keryx pays cited creators
What if a source were missing?
Temporarily leave out one source to see which research targets retain excerpts in this report.
Showing the original excerpt ledger.
According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what is the difference between an access toll and a citation reward?
2 recorded excerpts remain.
Inspect remaining excerpts
“Keryx separates the cost of opening source content from the reward for citing it.”
S1 · github.com · keryx/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md at main · tang-vu/keryx · GitHub · version e3f367e1004ae828ea1bee215057b2863f4572159fc14f230648ccf1aeed8090
“A citation reward is a separate payment considered after the answer is written and its evidence checked.”
S1 · github.com · keryx/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md at main · tang-vu/keryx · GitHub · version e3f367e1004ae828ea1bee215057b2863f4572159fc14f230648ccf1aeed8090
According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, does a paid read guarantee a citation reward?
1 recorded excerpt remain.
Inspect remaining excerpts
“A paid read does not guarantee a citation reward.”
S1 · github.com · keryx/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md at main · tang-vu/keryx · GitHub · version e3f367e1004ae828ea1bee215057b2863f4572159fc14f230648ccf1aeed8090
According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what happens to the citation pool when no citation qualifies?
1 recorded excerpt remain.
Inspect remaining excerpts
“When no citation qualifies, the citation pool stays unspent, while access tolls already settled remain paid.”
S2 · Keryx Engineering (first-party) · How Keryx pays cited creators · version sha256:0ee74abc5d0a57df70614ed65bf58ad2a681def7f2a3ea6a49831ba68fc31d76
What limitation does the specified Keryx Engineering article indicate about what a citation reward proves?
1 recorded excerpt remain.
Inspect remaining excerpts
“This is first-party engineering documentation based on repository commit 9ea84fa, not independent reporting or customer evidence.”
S2 · Keryx Engineering (first-party) · How Keryx pays cited creators · version sha256:0ee74abc5d0a57df70614ed65bf58ad2a681def7f2a3ea6a49831ba68fc31d76
Targets are requested topics, not verified assertions. Excerpts do not prove truth or independent corroboration. This view keeps the answer, confidence and payments unchanged and makes no new requests.
Research evidence matrix
Compare unverified research targets with cited sources and inspect recorded excerpts. An empty cell means no inspectable excerpt was recorded; it does not establish whether a claim is true, false, or disputed. Coverage and agent confidence do not prove entailment, measured accuracy or complete synthesis.
| Research target (unverified) | Inspection status | [S1] keryx/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md at main · tang-vu/keryx · GitHubPublication: github.comPublished: Not recorded | [S2] How Keryx pays cited creatorsPublication: Keryx Engineering (first-party)Published: 2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z |
|---|---|---|---|
| According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what is the difference between an access toll and a citation reward? | Recorded excerpt | Inspect 2 excerptsKeryx separates the cost of opening source content from the reward for citing it. A citation reward is a separate payment considered after the answer is written and its evidence checked. | No excerpt recorded |
| According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, does a paid read guarantee a citation reward? | Recorded excerpt | Inspect 1 excerptA paid read does not guarantee a citation reward. | No excerpt recorded |
| According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what happens to the citation pool when no citation qualifies? | Recorded excerpt | No excerpt recorded | Inspect 1 excerptWhen no citation qualifies, the citation pool stays unspent, while access tolls already settled remain paid. |
| What limitation does the specified Keryx Engineering article indicate about what a citation reward proves? | Recorded excerpt | No excerpt recorded | Inspect 1 excerptThis is first-party engineering documentation based on repository commit 9ea84fa, not independent reporting or customer evidence. |
Reference export
2 article references. Recorded titles, links and dates; observed scholarly records also include supplied authors, DOI and journal metadata with read limits. Review metadata before using in a paper. Import RIS into Zotero with File → Import.
Cited sources and references
- 1keryx/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md at main · tang-vu/keryx · GitHubgithub.comFree public reference · no creator payment · extracted html text40%
- 2How Keryx pays cited creatorsKeryx Engineering (first-party) · 2026-09-0860%$0.006 planned
Decision log · 86 steps
Breaking down: "I am a technical analyst at a small startup evaluating Keryx's creator-payment receipts. Read the registered, verified Keryx Engineering (first-party) source, specifically the full article 'How Keryx pays cited creators' at https://github.com/tang-vu/keryx/blob/main/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md (feed: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tang-vu/keryx/main/docs/engineering/feed.xml). In a short English note, explain the difference between an access toll and a citation reward, whether a paid read guarantees a reward, and what happens to the citation pool when no citation qualifies. Give an inspectable citation to that article and one limitation of what a citation reward proves. Label the article as first-party documentation at its stated revision, rather than evidence of current independent customer adoption. Use the eligible registered creator route within the 0.02 USDC source/reward budget; disclose actual access and citation payments separately."
Identified 4 research target(s) to investigate; these are not established facts
Quick mode: at most 2 paid/cached/public reads, with no marketplace probe or gap-expansion round.
Supplied source URL https://github.com/tang-vu/keryx/blob/main/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md admitted as an unread discovery lead. No official authorship or evidence established; a supplied fragment requests a section but only a bounded whole-document read is supported.
Supplied source URL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tang-vu/keryx/main/docs/engineering/feed.xml admitted as an unread discovery lead. No official authorship or evidence established; a supplied fragment requests a section but only a bounded whole-document read is supported.
Web search: 2/2 planned queries attempted, 2 succeeded, 14 public page previews/leads, 0 unavailable queries; query text bounded at 500 characters. Previews and supplied URLs are discovery only. Public reads spend no USDC; model and service operating costs remain separate.
Discovered 2 verified creator source(s) and 44 free public reference(s)
Recalled 27 past runs on this subject — how these sources performed when they were available.
ERC-8004 reputation loaded — composite scores on this subject.
Claim-aware portfolio (exhaustive; bounded selection, not a claim of global optimality) selected 2/6 positive proposal(s): 1 free/cache selections + 1 paid fresh selections, predicting 4/4 claim(s) above the evidence floor with $0.002000/$0.010000 fetch USDC reserved.
Free-preview pre-check maps an actionable source to every sub-claim (4/4); paid reading may proceed within the budget.
This is the exact caller-requested first-party Keryx Engineering article URL; a free read of the bounded whole document is the most direct way to answer all four targets (toll vs reward, paid-read guarantee, unqualified citation pool, reward limitation). - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward. — selected for the claim-aware evidence portfolio (targets claims 1, 2, 3, 4; 0 fetch USDC, 1 attention slot).
This is the registered first-party Keryx Engineering full article 'How Keryx pays cited creators' at the stated 2026-09-08 revision, explicitly covering access tolls, citation rewards, exact-quote evidence checks, contribution weights and settlement limits — the authoritative source for all four targets. At 0.002 USDC it fits the 0.02 budget and is the eligible registered creator route. — selected for the claim-aware evidence portfolio (targets claims 1, 2, 3, 4; $0.002000 fetch USDC, 1 attention slot).
arXiv philanthropy news is unrelated to Keryx access tolls, citation rewards, or citation pool behavior; no target is worth investigating here. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
BIS gold-price research has no bearing on Keryx creator-payment receipts or citation reward mechanics. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Open-source AI tool survey does not address Keryx access tolls, citation rewards, or pool handling. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Cloudflare Workers module registry engineering is unrelated to Keryx citation reward documentation. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Creative Commons heritage roundtable concerns open licensing, not Keryx's toll-versus-reward distinction or citation pool rules. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
DeepMind private AI compute memory announcement has no relevance to Keryx creator-payment receipts. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
DOAJ library publishing toolkit post does not discuss Keryx access tolls, citation rewards, or citation pools. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Docker/CNCF agent permissions spec is unrelated to Keryx citation reward mechanics. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
DuckDB plain-English SQL conditions article does not cover Keryx payment or citation reward topics. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Long-context QA evaluation writing is unrelated to Keryx access tolls, citation rewards, or pool behavior. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Go inliner blog post has no bearing on Keryx creator-payment receipts or citation reward documentation. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
ToolGrad dataset generation research is unrelated to Keryx citation reward mechanics. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
LLM autonomous agents overview does not address Keryx access tolls, citation rewards, or citation pool handling. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Microsoft Research Asia Singapore lab update has no relevance to Keryx creator-payment receipts. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Netlify Git infrastructure interview is unrelated to Keryx citation reward documentation. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Ollama Jev-style decision models announcement does not discuss Keryx access tolls, citation rewards, or citation pools. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
OpenAI Developers plugin setup guide has no bearing on Keryx creator-payment receipts. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
OpenAlex affiliation-error post touches bibliometrics but not Keryx's toll-versus-reward distinction, paid-read guarantee, or citation pool rules. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
PostgreSQL BM25 extension news is unrelated to Keryx citation reward mechanics. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
PyTorch conference training announcement does not address Keryx access tolls, citation rewards, or pool behavior. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Rust debugging survey results have no relevance to Keryx creator-payment receipts. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
MiMo-V2.6 Pro architecture notes are unrelated to Keryx citation reward documentation. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Spotify AI build-quality article does not discuss Keryx access tolls, citation rewards, or citation pools. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Stripe fraud data for AI startups concerns payments risk, not Keryx's toll-versus-reward distinction or citation pool handling. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Supabase product recap about Postgres/application services; unrelated to Keryx access tolls, citation rewards or citation pools. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Tailscale PAM networking/security post; no bearing on Keryx creator-payment receipts or citation mechanics. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
ML engineering keynote transcript; unrelated to the specified Keryx Engineering article and its payment semantics. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
vLLM disaggregated serving guide; concerns inference infrastructure, not Keryx tolls/rewards. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Wikimedia community documentation story; different subject entirely from Keryx citation rewards. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
x402 Foundation launch announcement is background on the payment protocol Keryx uses, but it does not state Keryx's toll-vs-reward distinction, guarantee rules, pool handling or reward limitations. - free public feed reference; no purchase or creator reward.
Caller-supplied Keryx Engineering feed.xml; free read may confirm the article's stated revision/date and first-party provenance, supporting targets 0-3 indirectly. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward. — the claim-aware portfolio chose a stronger, less redundant set inside the 2-source attention and $0.010000 fetch-budget caps, so this proposal stays unspent.
Keryx's own site describes the two-toll model (access toll for a read, separate weighted reward for a cited answer) and Arc testnet USDC settlement, directly relevant to targets 0-2 as first-party product documentation. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward. — the claim-aware portfolio chose a stronger, less redundant set inside the 2-source attention and $0.010000 fetch-budget caps, so this proposal stays unspent.
LinkedIn promotional post about Keryx paying a creator; social announcement, not the specified engineering article, and unlikely to state the toll/reward distinction, guarantee or pool rules. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward.
Estimize page about Keryx Biopharmaceuticals (KERX) earnings estimates; a different company entirely, irrelevant to Keryx creator payments. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward.
Keryx-Labs desktop wallet for on-chain AI inference mining rewards; a different Keryx product line, not the citation-reward documentation requested. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward.
Bitcointalk ANN about Keryx GPU PoW mining and on-chain inference; unrelated to access tolls, citation rewards or citation pools. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward.
YouTube tutorial on mining KRX on Windows; no relevance to Keryx creator-payment receipt semantics. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward.
Keryx-Labs on-chain AI inference page; describes miner inference flow, not the citation-reward documentation targets. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward.
Activity page for an unrelated 'keryx' Android chat app by a different owner; no connection to the Keryx payment protocol. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward.
Fireworks AI billing-operations job posting; unrelated to Keryx citation rewards. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward.
Keryx's own answers archive shows a cited answer summarizing the access-toll vs citation-reward distinction from Keryx Engineering (first-party), useful corroboration for targets 0-2 though secondary to the article itself. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward. — the claim-aware portfolio chose a stronger, less redundant set inside the 2-source attention and $0.010000 fetch-budget caps, so this proposal stays unspent.
Glama listing describes the two-toll x402 design (fixed access toll plus dynamic citation reward, uncited earns only the toll, cited earns more after a grounding gate), directly relevant to targets 0-2 and the reward-limitation target 3. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward. — the claim-aware portfolio chose a stronger, less redundant set inside the 2-source attention and $0.010000 fetch-budget caps, so this proposal stays unspent.
Keryx-Labs node release notes about the Proof-of-Model hardfork; mining protocol, not creator citation payments. - free public original-page READ selection (not a cache hit); no purchase or creator reward.
Paid Keryx owner release notes abstract (v0.27.10) covers research/security fixes, not the toll-vs-reward, guarantee, pool or limitation content; the free requested article is the better spend.
Agent spend wallet ready: 0x9e88d16c3ecb07b9e84df13ef38dd6b673bd285c (balance sufficient)
READ https://github.com/tang-vu/keryx/blob/main/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md - selected original public page, 0 USDC; not a cache hit.
Read extracted public text from https://github.com/tang-vu/keryx/blob/main/docs/engineering/2026-09-08-citation-rewards.md - S1; quote matching establishes source grounding, not fact verification.
Paying $0.002 toll to read Keryx Engineering (first-party) — How Keryx pays cited creators…
Paid $0.002 to Keryx Engineering (first-party) — How Keryx pays cited creators (settled e1cd75e4-c…) — S2
Sub-claim "According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what i…": 100% covered by S1, S2
Sub-claim "According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, does a…": 100% covered by S1, S2
Sub-claim "According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what h…": 100% covered by S1, S2
Sub-claim "What limitation does the specified Keryx Engineering article…": 100% covered by S2
The supplied first-party Keryx passages directly answer all four requested sub-claims. S1 and S2 both state that an access toll purchases a read through the source's x402 endpoint, while a citation reward is a separate payment considered after the answer is written and its evidence checked. Both also state that a paid read does not guarantee a citation reward. Both state that when no citation qualifies, the citation pool stays unspent while already-settled access tolls remain paid. For the limitation, S2 adds that a citation can qualify only when the source marker appears in the answer, synthesis declares that marker, and a validated quotation has support of at least 0.4; if the final evidence-assessment transport fails, reward authorization is disabled. This indicates the reward proves only that the deterministic evidence-ledger conditions were met, not independent customer adoption or broader truth. The article itself is labeled first-party engineering documentation based on repository commit 9ea84fa, not independent reporting or customer evidence. No requested sub-claim remains unanswered.
Final check — "According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what i…": 100% assessed by S1, S2
Final check — "According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, does a…": 100% assessed by S1, S2
Final check — "According to the specified Keryx Engineering article, what h…": 100% assessed by S1, S2
Final check — "What limitation does the specified Keryx Engineering article…": 100% assessed by S2
Final coverage assessment — The supplied first-party Keryx passages directly answer all four requested sub-claims. S1 and S2 both state that an access toll purchases a read through the source's x402 endpoint, while a citation reward is a separate payment considered after the answer is written and its evidence checked. Both also state that a paid read does not guarantee a citation reward. Both state that when no citation qualifies, the citation pool stays unspent while already-settled access tolls remain paid. For the limitation, S2 adds that a citation can qualify only when the source marker appears in the answer, synthesis declares that marker, and a validated quotation has support of at least 0.4; if the final evidence-assessment transport fails, reward authorization is disabled. This indicates the reward proves only that the deterministic evidence-ledger conditions were met, not independent customer adoption or broader truth. The article itself is labeled first-party engineering documentation based on repository commit 9ea84fa, not independent reporting or customer evidence. No requested sub-claim remains unanswered.
Synthesizing a grounded answer from 2 source(s)…
Relevance review returned; only checked excerpts can retain support, and review cannot raise it.
Delivering 5 summary sentence(s), each tied to one checked verbatim excerpt; complete synthesis remains unverified.
Source-matched public excerpt (no creator reward) — S1, research target 1, proposed support 90% (estimate, not entailment): “Keryx separates the cost of opening source content from the reward for citing it.”
Source-matched public excerpt (no creator reward) — S1, research target 1, proposed support 80% (estimate, not entailment): “A citation reward is a separate payment considered after the answer is written and its evidence checked.”
Source-matched public excerpt (no creator reward) — S1, research target 2, proposed support 95% (estimate, not entailment): “A paid read does not guarantee a citation reward.”
Source-matched reward-eligible excerpt — S2, research target 3, proposed support 95% (estimate, not entailment): “When no citation qualifies, the citation pool stays unspent, while access tolls already settled remain paid.”
Source-matched reward-eligible excerpt — S2, research target 4, proposed support 70% (estimate, not entailment): “This is first-party engineering documentation based on repository commit 9ea84fa, not independent reporting or customer evidence.”
Prepared a sentence-cited summary from 2 source(s)
Confidence: Low — Each summary sentence is tied to a verbatim excerpt and model-checked; completeness and independent factual correctness remain unverified. Evidence assessment: 2 evidence-verified sources cover every sub-claim, but corroboration or support strength is limited.
github.com contributed 40% - free public reference; reward share withheld
Keryx Engineering (first-party) contributed 60% - reward $0.006
Settled $0.006 citation reward → 0x3d609eF127094624cC434aAd5A9fAcA0851dAa2D (edea64d3-c…)
Done. Spent $0.008 across 2 confirmed/simulated payment(s) to creators.
Portable research receipt
Take the evidence trail with you
One deterministic JSON bundle binds the answer, visible decisions, exact article versions, claim evidence and a Circle-settlement snapshot under SHA-256. Retain the digest to detect later changes; the self-check is not a publisher or Keryx signature.
Exact receipt still current
1 exact cited article version still match Keryx's current index. The source cited here has published nothing new since this dispatch settled.
Carries this dispatch’s question as context — never its answer. The next dispatch is read from sources bought for it.